Matheus made me remember about the big dispute between which two games are better; Counter Strike Source or Counter Strike 1.6. Even though Counter Strike Source is newer than 1.6, still more people play 1.6. It may be the fact that in CS 1.6, you can easily download it anywhere in the internet, while in Source it is much harder to do so, since from what I know, the only way to play it, is to buyt it. It may also be the fact that CSS took a while to launch, and as a result, many people who started with 1.6, gave up in even trying to play CSS. I will state the differences between both:
CSS:
Better graphics
Better quality in motion
Better resolution
Better sound quality
Heavier size for PC
Lower amount of people playing
CS 1.6:
Better playability
Higher amount of people playing
Light for the PC
Easier to control weapons
I believe that I might have left somethings out, because I'm not a regular player of CS 1.6, but from the few times that I have played 1.6, I think CSS is WAY better! Of course, it's a matter of opinion.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
i think that 1.6 is better because i used to play it. HAAAHAAHAHA CSS is bad because u play it .
ReplyDeleteYOU ARE A CONE IN CSS;
Poor child... you know that CSS is better, you just can't admit it!
ReplyDeleteIf I'm really a "Cone"... lets do a x1 to prove it
ReplyDeleteGreat logic there, Matheus. :)
ReplyDelete